Monday, December 20, 2010

Political struggles and power struggle - Reinterpretation of the incident high-Rao (1)

 Occurred in 1954, Minister of the near East China Bureau, first secretary of the CPC Central Committee Rao Shushi, suddenly became the Rao Shushi resolution anti-Party Alliance order out of chaos in all major cases since the founding of various vindicated and correct, put off the adopted by the Sixth Plenary Session, )
In fact, over half a century, this far-reaching impact on the ruling party's major historical events occurred during the origin and little known, is the history of the Chinese Communist Party has not been declassified a few major historical mystery. ()
This situation is caused by many reasons. First, the complexity of the event itself. Since the unknown outsider research, the Council, there are few real insiders, many of the victims unwittingly strayed into enough, the feel wrong for life. The second is the product of the political overlay the dust. The more intense, and often take the clear. Third, in the conclusion, the treatment is definitely the right time. can be said that the )
1991, the Bo issued a reflects the general outline of events, after the official history books, and more to the book as a master copy. but some of the joints of words in the book is unknown, and there pass the whitewash between the primary, leaving many historical mystery yet clear analysis. ()
because the following and see the old past, Chen said, the courage to play a source extension, the corner of the world saw the events surrounding the complex. such as the former deputy secretary of the Board at the second Northeast Zhang Xiushan and discipline head of the daughter of Zhang Ji Zhang Mingyuan Zhao Jialiang and the coauthor of Drafts and notes materials inspection, in Review historical data, through her tick Jue, the history of the scattered fragments of stitching together one by one, basically reproduce the original appearance of this history. Although the book centers card too much, guess through the heavy, even at the Writing the history of injury, but the original provided valuable historical data, the disclosure of key details of many unknown, on the ; contains the ruling Communist power after the first high-level competition, a huge and far-reaching impact. This major event context clues to clarify the fundamental, may not only subvert the past, people's understanding of history, but also extends the history of the ruling Communist vision, to the founding of a major political party after the previous event provides a new interpretation of the path. and when high, Rao ; the charges no longer valid, out. Professor Lin Yunhui light of these new historical writing on the into research, innovation masterpiece. [4] ()
economic recovery began to go to large-scale economic construction. In the political line, China began the transition from New Democracy to socialism, a comprehensive introduction of the Soviet planned economy system; in the state system, from central and regional levels, separation of powers transition to highly centralized system of centralized leadership structure, the ruling party began a new round of power redistribution. In the history of the transition process, the various conflicts focused on the ruling party, appears in the ;, both the concept of conflict and conflict of interest rule, political struggles, and the dual nature of the struggle for power. The right of the political struggle and fight, mutual stalemate, interacts, yin and yang, cross, is our interpretation of key. ()
one line of the political struggles of the founding of
ideas from the country perspective, how to build socialism society's policy is clear; of China to the Soviet model as an example, to achieve the future of socialism, is also very clear. Therefore, the party of differences, originally from the )
democratic system of society in Marxist theory is not typical of a very without words, is the original theoretical concept of the communist revolution. on the basis that pre-modern Chinese society is still in the stage production was developed .1945 Seven of the CPC held, had identified a the working people of the individual economic and cooperative economy, must let the private capitalist economy can not be manipulated in the context of national life to facilitate access to development in order to benefit the community forward. > However, the Chinese Communists came to power, adhere to democratic rule on whether the problem line, political differences within the party after another, in practice some of the conflicts occurred. The political differences between Mao Zedong and Liu Shaoqi albeit represented, but also in the party between the high and middle cadres. which both recognize the differences, there are policy discord, but also to history conflicts .1954 factions within the party occurred in the of a major inner-party struggle. ()
adhere to and do not adhere to democratic nation-building strategy, is both a problem of the ruling party's political line, but also a productivity standard. In the early Communist power, the party has made any arguments many times, and lead to factional differences. are: ()
1949 年 4 months, on Liu Shaoqi's electricity ()
1950 year, on the northeast rich peasants party debate on the issue. Gao's view is that party members do not allow workers, lenders and other exploitation. Central Organization Department of the view that workers alone can allow members to mobilize the production of farmers initiative. Shaoqi support the Central Organization Department of the view that the rich peasants, members appear not horrible. and Gao views are supported by Mao Zedong.
1951 years, a debate about the mutual assistance and cooperation on agriculture. Shaoqi support the views of North China Bureau , criticized the rush to deny the Shanxi Provincial economic point of view of individual farmers is advice and support of Shanxi Provincial Committee, and then proceed to promote agricultural mutual assistance and cooperation to do. Soon, Gao Mao submitted to the Co-operative movement in northeast rural production report, Mao Zedong spoke highly of the report, and forwarded to the person with comments on around.

No comments:

Post a Comment